Regardless of whatever good points that may
or may not be in the immigration bill passed by the Democrat-controlled Senate,
my basic problem is that I don’t believe anything that this administration says
or promises. Immigration reform has been
passed before, and there are plenty of existing laws on the books to reduce
illegal immigration and to provide temporary workers.
I just don’t trust people who ignore the
laws when they disagree with them..
It was good to find out that House
Republicans may agree with me.
Morning Examiner: Immigration reform is
dead and Obamacare implementation killed it
“Let me tell you something else, David,” NBC
News’s Chuck Todd told David Gregory on Meet the Press Sunday,
“the White House had been so confident that they were going to sign immigration
reform this year. But for the first time I am hearing that there is some doubt
seeping in..... What changed this week is that Republicans lost all trust in
President Obama’s ability to faithfully execute the laws of the United
States.
Delayed mandates
and invitation to fraud
On Tuesday of last week, news broke that the Treasury Department was about to
announce it’s intention to delay implementation of Obamacare’s employer mandate
for a year. Nothing in the law gives the Obama administration authority to
delay the mandate, but he did it anyway.
As bad as that blow to the rule of law was,
the Department of Health and Human Services followed it up with 600 pages of regulations Friday,
one of which also delayed a requirement that states verify the eligibility
information submitted by applicants. Not only is this also not authorized in
the statute, but, as National Review’s Yuval Levin notes, it
is also an open invitation for those wanting health care subsidies to defraud
taxpayers.
“They will
simply ignore the parts they don’t like.”
“They have shown no respect for traditional Constitutional separation of
powers,” Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., told National Review‘s
John Fund about the impact of the Obamacare delays on the immigration debate,
“and that makes it difficult to pass laws where the fear is that they will
simply ignore the parts they don’t like.”
Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, who is on the
House Judiciary Committee and had been a member of a bipartisan group working
on immigration reform, echoed Roe’s concerns on Meet the Press.
“In fact, if you look at this Obamacare debacle that they have right now, this
administration is actually deciding when and where to actually enforce the law.
And that’s what some of us in the House are concerned about. If you give to
this administration the authority to decide when they’re going to enforce the
law, how they’re going to enforce the law … what’s going to happen is that
we’re going to give legalization to 11 million people and Janet Napolitano is
going to come to Congress and tell us that the border is already secure and
nothing else needs to happen.”
Moving on
House Republicans already have a full plate on their agenda this summer and
fall. Not only will there be full investigations into the legal basis for all
of the Obamacare delays, but Congress must also pass new spending authorization
to keep the government running by the end of September, and they have to raise
the debt limit some time before January. Considering the breach of trust
Obamacare implementation has already created, just keeping the government
running will keep Congress busy enough.
3 Comments:
Whether you like it or not, the fact is that all administrations to one degree or another, selectively enforce laws. For example, the Bush administration conducted phone and internet surveillance without involving the FISA court, in obvious contravention of the law.
Conn Carroll's assertion that Republicans lost all trust in Obama's ability to faithfully execute the laws of the U. S., this week, is nothing more than blatant partisanship.
Russ said:
"I do not believe
"I do not trust
Elsewere on the web it was said that all politicians lie.
All politicians do not lie. Just that many do does not make it universal.
I have met many who hold publi office that are people of integrity. They no not intentionally lie.
I believe that for the Presidency of USA we can demand and expect intergrity.
Obama does not represent intergrity, nor does he believe in concepts espoused by U. S. Constittion.
The Declaration of independence and the Constitution of USA enshrined freedom and property rights. Obama is called a statist. I call him a Marxist.
Understand that Marxism and concepts of those who wrote Constitution are very different.
Thank you for presenting question of trust.
It is about time you posted. Quit using age as an excuse. That is exactly what Obama wants...
the biggest problem is that everybody is losing trust in this administration, even his own party.
Only one bad apple can wreck the whole barrel, how many bad apples are there now? too bloody many.
Post a Comment
<< Home