Monday, May 26, 2008

CBS News and 60 Minutes Are Just Liars

We have understood for more than 30 years that CBS lies in order to advance a liberal-Democrat agenda, and it was no surprise when Dan Rather completely imploded. Most nights and Sundays the bias is subtle, but the network's falling and dismal ratings indicate that fewer and fewer Americans believe anything that they say. The following report illustrates another obvious example of the lengths CBS will go to in order to harm Republicans, especially Karl Rove. I apologize for its length; I saw no way to edit it fairly.

A Conspiracy So Lunatic...
Only 60 Minutes could fall for it.
by John H. Hinderaker
05/26/2008, The Weekly Standard

Jill Simpson is an unusual woman. A lawyer, she has scratched out an uncertain living in DeKalb County, Alabama. Fellow DeKalb County lawyers describe her as "a very strange person" who "lives in her own world." The daughter of rabid Democrats, she has rarely if ever been known to participate in politics as even a low-level volunteer. Yet today, she is a minor celebrity who is unvaryingly described in the press as a "Republican operative." Those who know her in DeKalb County scoff at the idea that she is a Republican at all.

Recently, Simpson's house and law office were on the auction block. Rumor has it that she is leaving DeKalb County for good and heading for the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Jill Simpson, who barely got by in Alabama, is now toasted by the national Democratic party and featured on network and cable news. All this because she has testified--without a shred of supporting evidence--to a conspiracy so vast as to be not just implausible, but ridiculous.

Simpson claims to have participated in a phone conversation with several Alabama Republicans in which she was made privy to a plot involving the Republican governor of Alabama, Bob Riley, a former justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, a federal judge, two United States attorneys, several assistant United States attorneys, the Air Force, and, apparently 12 jurors, to "railroad" former governor Don Siegelman into his 2006 conviction for bribery and mail fraud. Every person whose name Simpson has invoked has labeled her story a fantasy, including Siegelman; she claimed to have played a key role both in his giving up his unsuccessful contest of the 2002 gubernatorial election and in his defense of the criminal charges against him.

Normally one might expect a person of uncertain mental health who alleged such a comprehensive conspiracy to be ushered quietly offstage. Instead, in late February, CBS's 60 Minutes gave her a starring role. This can be explained only by the fact that Simpson included in her fable, as she related it to CBS, a final conspirator: Karl Rove, who, according to Simpson, orchestrated the plot against Siegelman.

In her 60 Minutes interview, Simpson claimed to have been Rove's secret agent in Alabama. She said that during Siegelman's term as governor of Alabama, Rove had asked her to follow Siegelman around and try to get photographs of him "in a compromising sexual position" with one of his aides. This led to one of the great moments in recent broadcast history:

60 Minutes's Scott Pelley: Were you surprised that Rove made this request?
Simpson: No.
Pelley: Why not?
Simpson: I had had other requests for intelligence before.
Pelley: From Karl Rove?
Simpson: Yes.

Pelley was at a crossroads: He knew that either (1) he was on the verge of uncovering a whole series of Rovian plots, the stuff of which Pulitzers are made, or (2) he was talking to a lunatic. Intuiting, no doubt, which way the conversation was likely to go, Pelley discreetly chose not to inquire further.

Simpson can offer no evidence that she has ever spoken to or met Karl Rove.

Moreover, when she told her story of the alleged conspiracy against Don Siegelman to John Conyers's House Judiciary Committee staff, she said that she heard references to someone named "Carl" in the aforementioned telephone conversation--she made the natural inference that this must be Karl Rove--but never offered the blockbuster claim that Rove himself had recruited her to spy on Siegelman. Neither in the affidavit that she submitted to the committee, nor in 143 pages of sworn testimony that she gave to the committee's staff, did she ever claim to have met Karl Rove, spoken to Karl Rove, or carried out any secret spy missions on his behalf, even though the whole point of her testimony was to try to spin out a plot against Siegelman that was ostensibly led by someone named "Carl."

60 Minutes chose to highlight Simpson's claim that she was Rove's secret agent without telling its viewers that this sensational allegation had been altogether absent from her sworn accounts. Subsequently, MSNBC's Dan Abrams invited Simpson to repeat her slur against Rove. This prompted Rove to write to Abrams, posing a series of questions about whether Abrams had used elementary journalistic methods to check the accuracy of Simpson's account.

Rove's letter drew a response from Abrams:

[Y]ou wrote, "Did it not bother you Ms. Simpson failed to mention [in her sworn statement to House Judiciary Committee staff] the claim she made to CBS for their Feb. 24, 2008 story, that you then repeated on Feb. 25th?"

Fair question. Which is why I asked her the following on Feb. 25, 2008: ABRAMS: And why have you never mentioned before the allegations of Rove and the pictures?

SIMPSON: Well, let me explain something to you. I talked to congressional investigators, Dan. And when I talked to those congressional investigators I told them that I had followed Don Siegelman and tried to get pictures of him cheating on his wife.

However, they suggested to me that that was not relevant because there was nothing illegal about that and they'd just prefer that not come up at the hearing that day.

Put aside the fact that before she was interviewed by House Democratic staffers, Simpson submitted an affidavit on the alleged conspiracy. In her affidavit, she did not claim that she had ever met Rove, let alone been his secret agent in Alabama.

What MSNBC found plausible was Simpson's suggestion that House Democratic staffers got their hands on the story that Karl Rove had tried to get compromising photographs of the governor of Alabama and they hushed it up! The credulity of modern journalists apparently knows no bounds.

Simpson's story is unbelievable and contradictory on so many levels that it cannot bear a moment's inspection. (Wholly unexplained, for example, is why, if Rove or anyone else wanted to spy on the governor of Alabama, he would assign the task to a conspicuously large redhead with no experience as an investigator and no ties to the Republican party, rather than hire a professional investigator.) But that has not prevented her from being hailed as a hero by the Democratic party. Citing her testimony, John Conyers has threatened to subpoena Karl Rove to testify before his committee. Siegelman himself has called her a "great American," while simultaneously acknowledging that her story, insofar as it claims a relationship with him, is false.

Siegelman's embrace of Simpson is understandable. He is facing seven years in a federal prison; any port in a storm. But what explains CBS's and MSNBC's decision to peddle her fable?

Karl Rove has become the man who cannot be libeled. Any story that includes his name is treated as self-authenticating, requiring neither supporting evidence nor the barest plausibility. Having committed the unforgivable sin of contributing to two successful Republican presidential campaigns, Rove has become, for American media, the equivalent of an outlaw, possessing no rights that must be respected.

John H. Hinderaker is a contributor to the blog Power Line and a contributing writer to The Daily Standard.

A free press is critical to a free country like ours, but huge media outlets like CBS and NBC that lie and distort to push an agenda are a danger to our liberties. Democracy needs informed voters, not propagandized lemmings.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button


At 10:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Siegelman was convicted of taking a political contribution in return for appointing the contributor to a state office, something that happens every day in every state without generating an indictment. After his conviction the judge sent him directly to the penitentiary without giving him time on bail to set his affairs in order. Normally a judge continues bail and sets a date for sentencing in the near future. Why the need for immediate prison time in this case? Something smells fishy and if Rove was involved we may find out soon. He has been subpoenaed to appear before congress, but of course there's no guaranty that he won't lie.

At 11:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hinderaker is a Rove puppet and this article, particularly as it applies to Ms. Simpson, is total fiction. For instance, her mother is a lifelong Republican, has a wall full of pictures with Reagan, DeLay and others and serves on a Bush Small Business panel. Rove just wants to find out how much Simpson has on him, and it's a lot. If you saw ABC Sunday you'll note Rove dodged a direct question about his contacts with DOJ regarding Siegelman, twice. Wake up, you can be a Repub and still have a brain.

At 1:32 PM, Blogger RussWilcox said...

The above two comments illustate, sadly, that liberals not only suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome, but that this unreasoning hatred also applies to Karl Rove because of the support Rove has provided the President. They will believe any smear against either man.

They also can't refrain from insulting me and Mr. Rove.

At 3:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I truly believe that CBS and NBC are liars. Look at their credit ratings. They can't even compare to Fox News. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize this. These fool Liberals are in the tank for the Democrats, particularly Barack Obama. I get a kick out of listening to that guy talk about "Change." He wouldn't make a pimple on a good president's butt. I honestly believe that the Liberal elite media will stop at nothing to smear this president or anyone connected to him.

At 5:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Scott Horton in Harper's Magazine June 24, 2007 wrote:

“We have a Justice Department that has substantially been turned into a political arm of the White House,” Bruce Fein told the McClatchy Newspapers earlier this week. He went on to say that the public could have no confidence that federal prosecutions of Democrats by the Justice Department were fair. Mr. Fein is a conservative Republican lawyer and legal scholar of some note–the former senior legal analyst at the Heritage Foundation. As the Deputy Attorney General, he was responsible for the operational management of the Justice Department under President Ronald Reagan. Bruce Fein would not make such a charge lightly. He is speaking from knowledge, not conjecture.

At 7:57 AM, Blogger RussWilcox said...

Fein is of counsel to Ron Paul's campaign for the 2008 Presidential nomination.

At 1:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So what. He's still a conservative Republican lawyer with extensive experience in the Justice Department. He knows whereof he speaks.

At 1:41 PM, Blogger RussWilcox said...

Anyone associated closely with Ron Paul cannot be taken seriously.

At 5:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have made similar comments about McCain in the past.


Post a Comment

<< Home