The Ultimate IRS Outrage

I stopped calling acts by Obama and his administration “outrages” long ago.  There were too many to keep straight, and it got almost tiresome after awhile.  But this involvement by the corrupted IRS has to be the ultimate outrage – persecution of a thought.  Will no-one try to stop this man?  Is there an honest Democrat anywhere?  This is right out of the communist playbook.

Fox News is reporting that the IRS will monitor terminations by employers to find out if any are due to an attempt to avoid Obamacare, and if an employer lies about his intentions, he will be hauled in for perjury.

Businesses must swear to the IRS that Obamacare had nothing to do with firings

Rick Moran February 12, 2014 American Thinker

google_ad_client = "pub-4560167926987914"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text_image"; //2006-11-22: AT - Articles - 300 by 250 google_ad_channel = "0110545599"; google_color_border = "336699"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "999966"; google_color_text = "000000"; google_color_url = TTTTTTTTTTTTTT      The most coercive law in American history just got more coercive.

In delaying the employer mandate - again - the White House made it clear that businesses thinking of downsizing their company to avoid Obamacare mandates better think again.

Fox News:

Is the latest delay of ObamaCare regulations politically motivated? Consider what administration officials announcing the new exemption for medium-sized employers had to say about firms that might fire workers to get under the threshold and avoid hugely expensive new requirements of the law. Obama officials made clear in a press briefing that firms would not be allowed to lay off workers to get into the preferred class of those businesses with 50 to 99 employees. How will the feds know what employers were thinking when hiring and firing? Simple. Firms will be required to certify to the IRS - under penalty of perjury - that ObamaCare was not a motivating factor in their staffing decisions. To avoid ObamaCare costs you must swear that you are not trying to avoid ObamaCare costs. You can duck the law, but only if you promise not to say so.

["That's the good thing about being president. I can do whatever I want." - President Obama joking about getting a restricted-access tour of Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.]

War of words - With millions of insurance cancellations and workers dumped from employer-based policies due to ObamaCare, a relatively narrow exemption for medium-sized employers might sound like a trifling thing. But to Obama Democrats desperate to hold the Senate in the face of simmering anger over the botched rollout and false promises of the law, any little bit helps. And having the IRS serve as the talking-point enforcer for businesses tempted to speak out about firings under the law will sure help message discipline. Remember, the administration wants to focus on Americans being "transitioned" to ObamaCare not dumped from existing policies, and "freed" from having to work in order to get insurance rather than quitting their jobs in order to get free coverage.

"Under penalty of perjury..." Apparently, lying to a grand jury about sex is OK but lying to the IRS about Obamacare will land you in jail.

Once again, the IRS is being employed as the administration enforcer in blocking free speech. If several dozen companies end up laying off employees to get below the 50 worker threshold for Obamacare, they will be prevented from blaming the ACA for the firings under penalty of perjury.

So not only does Obama push the bad news rising out of the implementation of the employer mandate past the November mid terms, he stifles the free speech of business owners. Who knows! Perhaps by the time the election rolls around, it will be illegal to criticize the administration about anything. It might become illegal to even say "Obamacare."

Why not? Who's going to stop them?

 

Page Printed from: at February 12, 2014 -