Saturday, March 28, 2009

The Best Global Warming Discussion Ever

The other day I went to a global warming presentation delivered by my friend, Mason Wilson (retired Professor Emeritus from the University of Rhode Island, College of Engineering). I was so impressed by the information he presented and by his organization of the material that I invited him to post it on my blog. He starts by explaining the difference between short range weather forecasting, based on real-time data – and longer range forecasting, based primarily on extrapolating historical data into the future. Next he points out the significance of the historical record of climate data on which there should be universal agreement. Lastly he points out some of the factors that may be more important than CO2 emissions in explaining some current conditions.

A Discussion of Global Warming and Latest Developments
by Dr. Mason Wilson

Global warming is most likely the most cited scientific problem in recent times, as many thousands of people rally behind those saying Global Warming is due to mankind, It satisfies the hunger of those who would like to see the downfall of the industrial giants who are profit centered, greedy - and are claimed to have no regard for the environment. And those opposed to the global warming concept are said to be bought off by these destroyers of the universe. The recent news items linking President Obama to the formation of the biggest carbon tax and trade company in the world and Al Gore's making millions off of the global warming problems make for hot topics of discussion. That’s the political side of the thrust to embrace global warming.

This article does not want to get in the middle of is not science. To put the science in perspective we will review the problems of forecasting weather, short range, medium range and long range forecasting (climatology) and the role that greenhouse gases can expect to play in the long range predictions, where they should be found in the atmosphere and the degree of influence that they may have in the atmosphere.

Short range forecasting in recent years has improved considerably, mostly because of the satellite information that is provided - cloud cover, infrared scans, Doppler radar and a host of new technologies support the local weather forecaster with an enormous amount of information. The classical weather map is assisted by this information so that 24 hour forecasts have achieved 70 to 80 percent accuracy and reasonable 10 day forecasting represents fairly good estimates of what is in the future.

However as one tries to predict things like hurricanes in the next one, two or three months, most forecaster rely mostly on historical evidence, such as the frequency of storms as illustrated in the next four figures

Most forecasting of hurricanes is based on these historical histories together with the latest positions of La Nina, El Nino, weather conditions in the Sahara Desert, and sea surface temperatures in order to modify the historical predictions. Even with all of these latter meteorological inputs, forecasting the number of hurricanes and their intensity is only a little better than a true historical forecast as shown in the following table. (CLICK TO ENLARGE)
Hurricane Forecast Accuracy

Climatology on the other hand relies on information based on past weather history which only goes back a few hundred years and paleo-climatology which yields ancient weather evidence as found in ice core samples, tree rings etc. It is generally recognized that the climate of the earth is governed by plate tectonics, volcano eruptions, sun variability and the earth’s orbit. Modern climate models all include the most famous and pioneering work of Milankovitch who successfully correlated and predicted the cyclic temperature variations of the earth using the inclination and declination of the earth together with the orbit fluctuations of the earth around the sun. This inclusion makes all climate models appear accurate, sometime leading to a false reliance on these models.

Milankovitch results are shown in the following figures

100,000 year cycle...angle of earth's axis varies
from 22-24 degrees every 41,000 years, and earth
wobbles away from the sun every 19,000 to
23,000 years driven solely by solar radiation

Global warming experts like to modify these temperature predictions by the effects of greenhouse gases such as shown in the following figure.

These are the absorption spectra, and climatologists who want to predict global warming from these figures must integrate the radiation absorbed by these gases together with the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere and their exposure to the incident radiation. No easy task. Much information can be derived from the above graph. The distribution of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is primarily due to its density as compared to air. Gas density varies with the molecular weight and the molecular weight of air is 28.9. Hence greenhouse gases having larger molecular weight should be found in the lower atmosphere and those having a lower molecular weight should be found in the higher altitudes. The molecular weight of carbon dioxide is 44 which is much heavier than air, consequently it should be only found in the lower atmosphere. The argument that it can be carried into the upper atmosphere by thunderstorms is highly implausible since the carbon dioxide can be easily removed by the water in the raindrops. Natural gas (methane) is quite a different story. It has a molecular weight of only 16 which is almost half the density of air, Consequently it should be found mainly in the upper atmosphere. Notice that water vapor is one of strongest of all of the greenhouse gases and the most abundant in the atmosphere. It has a molecular weight of on 18 as compared to air of 28.9 and should be found in the upper atmosphere, unless it condenses or freezes. When a gas absorbs incoming radiation the energy is transformed into kinetic energy of the molecule such as the vibrational oscillation of the double bond between the carbon and oxygen atoms as in carbon dioxide and into translation into kinetic energy. Some of the energy is also reradiated. Some of the absorbed energy is transferred to surrounding molecules through a collision process. The kinetic energy of the molecule represents the temperature of the gas.

The famous IPCC Conference that had concluded that global warming was caused by anthropogenic carbon dioxide relied very heavily on the Antarctic ice core data and global mean temperature trend as shown in the following two figures:


The first figure clearly shows that carbon dioxide leads the temperature profile, hence the conclusion that carbon dioxide causes global warming. The temperature increases shown in the second figure illustrates that the average global temperature increased during that time that carbon dioxide increased. The problem with this figure is in determining what portion of the increase is due to carbon dioxide greenhouse effect and what portion of the temperature increase is due to solar variability. If climate modelers assign to the carbon dioxide portion of this increase that is due to solar variability, their models will overcompensate the solar activity and will predict much higher temperatures. IPCC uses a radiation forcing function that requires many assumptions concerning the amount of radiation absorbed and re-radiated by carbon dioxide . Using this method can easily result in overestimates of the temperature increases caused by carbon dioxide. Recent observations have born this out as shown in the following figure.

Recent data by NOAA shows that the hot spots in the Arctic fall surprisingly close and along the intersection of two tectonic plates that form the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. It is well known that many vents occur along this ridge. These vents heat up the surrounding water and provide many minerals that support local marine fauna. The vents surface at Iceland and provides this country all of its power and heating needs. This ridge exits Iceland to the northwest and then to the northeast along the Greenland coast where most of the glacial melting is occurring. What a coincidence!

This striking comparison does not prove that plate tectonics is the cause of Arctic warming but does suggest an explanation of why this region is so much warmer than the surrounding area. It can also explain why the Arctic is losing ice cover while the Antartic appears to be gaining, as seen in the following two figures

Inspection of the ice and snow graph of the Antartic shows that in recent years there has been a record buildup of ice and snow in this region. This causes a greater pressure at the heads of the glaciers forcing them to calve more rapidly. Recent reports suggesting that the higher calving of these glaciers is due to global warming is very misleading.

Recent ice core studies also shows some conflicting data that leads one to question some of the assumptions made in the IPCC report. The following figure of a 2000 ice core shows that some of the time carbon dioxide leads the increase of temperature and some of the time the temperature precedes the increase of carbon dioxide. Recent cores in 2003 and 2005 appear to support the above figure.

Note: The blue line (CO2) sometimes leads the temperature line (red line) and sometimes follows it. This is in conflict with a conclusion that CO2 forces global warming.

The following figure also is not in line with the prediction of the global warming forecasts.

Recent findings indicate that solar variability more closely follows the climactic temperature than the increase of carbon dioxide.

One of the initial studies showing an increase of temperature with an increase in carbon dioxide is revisited and shown to correlate more with solar variability than any increase in carbon dioxide as shown below.

Last but not least if one still believes in global warming is due to anthropogenic carbon dioxide and thinks that we can do something about. The following figure show that even with a Herculean effort we are going to have an abysmally small effect.

Editorial Note:
I decided to add one of the slide exhibits that Professor Wilson presented at his talk, but did not include in this post – a slide that details the fact that the historical record clearly shows our planet going through cycles of cooling and warming. We are now in a cooling period of a warming cycle, and extrapolations would seem to show a continuation of this cooling period.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button


At 1:48 PM, Anonymous mls gta said...

Amazing article, thank you for sharing it. I wish everyone referred to actual research and science when talking about Global Warming, unlike Mr. Gore and many other "important men in lab coats".

Take care, Julie

At 1:10 PM, Anonymous michelle said...

WOW, love this. I respect Dr. Wilson's desire and ability to reort genuine science not simply his opinions. I learned so much from this article.

Thank you Professor Wilson,
Michelle Buckman

At 9:03 PM, Blogger Thomas said...

Over the past month I have read at least 100 articles about global warming. This is one of the most persuasive and efficient articles I have yet seen. The only suggestion I would make is that you consider including two additional points. 1. The work of Dr. Hienz Hug which demonstrates that doubling atmospheric CO2 would likely result in a temp. increase in the range of .0015 deg C.
2, The D.O.E. statistic which shows that 93% of new CO2 emissions from the use of fossil fuels between now and 2030will come from countries other than the U.S.A. - mostly China and India

Also, perhaps a link to this site to help readers realize that 32,000 other American Scientists see this as you do...

Thank you very much for sharing this wonderful article!

At 11:43 AM, Anonymous Mason said...

Thanks Thomas..people reading this article will see your references in the comments

At 8:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Strange that the earth is cooling when temperatures in the part of the world are rising and the average night and day temps are getting higher. This trend has been happening for the last twenty or so years, rainfall is getting less and less. Now you tell me that thermal activity is the reason the ice caps are melting. The Antarctic has been melting faster than the forecasts, and yet you would have me believe that the Antactic ice sheets is expanding all of a sudden. Some-one is wrong. Regardless of what is causing global warming, we as humans must reduce our footprint and polluting ways. Anything which does not alter the ways of nature must be a goal we strive for.

At 5:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have witnessed global warming for years. Coming from Alaska, I have seen glaciers retreat. I came across this video that shows global warming in action here: I showed my former global warming skeptic friends this movie and they all now believe it is happening at an alarming rate.

At 5:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe that inner electromagnetic energy is the solution. See my website for more details:

At 4:39 AM, Anonymous Andy Hale said...

Excellent article. I'm not a scientist, just an average guy who sees two things...
1. Here in the Midwest we just experienced the coldest summers on record.
2. A simple glance at NOAA historical data - year by year for the 100 years shows a definite cyclical pattern of warming and cooling. We are now in a cooling cycle. Never does this simple historical temperature grapgh show a sustained warming trend that never ends! In fact, the average temperature has remained the same for the entire time period,

At 9:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its really a excellent article..Thank you very much for this to the publishers.. We,Shree Gurukulam Hr.Sec School,Gobichettipalayam(PIN:638453,Erode(District),Tamilnadu,India.We also giving the awareness regarding the global warming to our school students through NSS(National Service Scheme)which is functioning in our school. We recently adopted a nearby village named Gopipalayam in our area and our NSS students made a strong campaign in the village regarding global warming and its effects to the village people. In the highlight of this,our students called to the village people to switch off their home lights on the past 05/09/09(Monday)night from 7.00PM to 8.00PM..It was held successfully on that day.We proud to say that we haave brought the global warming issue to the village peole.We also proud to say that we taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in our area.Readers are requested to send their appreciation&suggestion letters to the above address so that we could get some more motivation to fight against the global warming....Thank you..

At 11:38 AM, Blogger Doug Plumb said...

Thanks for this. The thing I always ask the pro AGW camp is:

Why do you think that the guys from and other prominent deniers are doing this ?
Do they have a scorched earth policy ?

Are the oil companies bribing them into letting the landmass on the planet drown under 20 ft of water ?

I think the whole man made global warming hypothesis can be well debunked without so many numbers and so much math. The fact is that CO2 isn't a big greenhouse has - the data from CO2 gets lost in the noise. Clouds play the major role.

Watch "Global Warming or Global Governance" by Michael Coffman. Its free on the web.

At 4:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi !.
might , perhaps curious to know how one can collect a huge starting capital .
There is no initial capital needed You may commense earning with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The firm incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with affiliates around the world.
Do you want to become a happy investor?
That`s your choice That`s what you wish in the long run!

I`m happy and lucky, I started to get income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to select a proper companion who uses your funds in a right way - that`s it!.
I earn US$2,000 per day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!
It`s easy to join , just click this link
and go! Let`s take our chance together to get rid of nastiness of the life

At 7:57 AM, Blogger Bill said...

Roman Warming Period > The Dark Ages > Med-Evil Period > Little Ice Age > Present Day!

All of these time periods, in chronological order, reflect the direct effect of global tempuratures on civilizations. The "Global Warming" enthusiasts have been exaggerating theoretical claims, and quite frankly, LYING to the world community. They have been touting theoretical models as scientific fact
and shutting out any real in-depth debate. There IS A DEBATE to be had.

Just watched "How The Earth Was Made" on the History Channel last night . It was a special on how the Sahara Dessert was formed. Finding Fossilized whale bones in the middle of the Sahara Dessert, and other evidence, scientists have concluded that the Sahara was once an ocean, and more recently, cycles between a lush green environment and a barren dessert every 20 thousand years. According to scientists the Sahara dessert has been experiencing this climatic cycling since it's formation 3 million years ago. According to scientists these climatic changes happen very abruptly. Soil core evidence shows that this happens as quickly as a couple hundred years. According to their evidence the last cycle began some 7 thousand years ago, humans left the Sahara migrating east to the Nile.

How do the people of Northern Africa conclude that the problems they may be experiencing with climatic changes in their country could possibly be anthropogenic.


This is just the latest scientific evidence that DOES NOT support the idea that Global Warming is man made. This stuff is everywhere, all you need to do is a little homework. The scientific community, all the disciplines, regularly draw conclusions that directly contradict the empty claims of anthropogenic climate change.

I do support basic environmental concerns and would support cleaner energy policies. It is in our best interest to make advances towards these goals.

At 11:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Author !
Quite right! Idea good, I support.

At 4:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Author !
Between us speaking, you should to try look in

At 10:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?
And you et an account on Twitter?

At 12:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello everyone!
I would like to burn a theme at here. There is such a thing, called HYIP, or High Yield Investment Program. It reminds of ponzy-like structure, but in rare cases one may happen to meet a company that really pays up to 2% daily not on invested money, but from real profits.

For several years , I make money with the help of these programs.
I'm with no money problems now, but there are heights that must be conquered . I get now up to 2G a day , and I started with funny 500 bucks.
Right now, I managed to catch a guaranteed variant to make a sharp rise . Turn to my blog to get additional info. [url=]Online Investment Blog[/url]

At 9:45 AM, Blogger Andi Prama said...

Earth Changes ------>

At 4:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello everyone!
I would like to burn a theme at this forum. There is such a thing, called HYIP, or High Yield Investment Program. It reminds of ponzy-like structure, but in rare cases one may happen to meet a company that really pays up to 2% daily not on invested money, but from real profits.

For several years , I earn money with the help of these programs.
I'm with no money problems now, but there are heights that must be conquered . I get now up to 2G a day , and I started with funny 500 bucks.
Right now, I managed to catch a guaranteed variant to make a sharp rise . Turn to my blog to get additional info. [url=]Online Investment Blog[/url]

At 11:54 PM, Blogger Amanda said...

Hello. I just have one question. As much as it would be sad for the human species to come to an end, has anyone ever considered survival of the fittest? Maybe we are just committing our own suicide??? Maybe we are not meant to be here forever. The Earth will recover from our destruction (not condoning--just saying). We won't--but nothing as ever survived here forever...what makes us think we are suppose to? Just curious...

At 6:54 AM, Anonymous sci king of global warming said...

global warming is really dangerous an extreamly helpful to the air we breath you guys are stupid im da really napster blood

At 11:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

May I…?
Signature:buy levitra professional online gzj

At 5:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's not my fault.
Signature:lipitor 40mg rbrtt
lexapro without prescription jnlye

At 7:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey all,

I'm currently doing research about the general opinion of the iPad. What do you think about it?

It seems like not everyone is thrilled about the iPad. They say the iPad has been hyped too much by Apple and it's not nearly as revolutionary as they make us believe it to be.
On the other hand there people can't wait to get their hands on it.

What do you think about the iPad and it's features? I will collect some of the input and [url=]write a nice article[/url] about it!

At 12:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey all,

I'm currently doing research about the general opinion of the iPad. What do you think about it?

It seems like not everyone is thrilled about the iPad. They say the iPad has been hyped too much by Apple and it's not nearly as revolutionary as they make us believe it to be.
On the other hand there people can't wait to get their hands on it.

What do you think about the iPad and it's features? I will collect some of the input and [url=]write a nice article[/url] about it!

At 2:16 PM, Anonymous John Daniell said...

I must disagree with your statements in the paragraph following the absorption spectra graphs. Gasses in the atmosphere do not gather at different levels due to different densities. If that were so, oxygen and nitrogen and the rare gasses making up the air would separate out which they plainly do not. All gasses mix due to diffusion and convection in the troposphere. CO2 in the atmosphere combines chemically with water to fall out in rain as carbonic acid, either to be diluted in the oceans or react with limestone to form carbonates. The Milankovitch cycles are much, much more powerful than any effect of CO2 on temperature. All CO2 might do is mitigate cooling during glaciation periods very slightly, and accelerate warming during interglacials, also slightly (second or third order effect). If you examine the Milankovitch cycles closely you can see that CO2 and methane levels lag temperature change, probably due to the change in biological activity, not the other way round. Currently we are almost at the peak of a 15 thousand year interglacial period where you would expect heating to be at a maximum.


Post a Comment

<< Home