Wikipedia Becomes Almost Useless

For a few years the internet site Wikipedia has provided a research source that millions use and rely on. Some time ago, it became widely understood that just about anyone could provide information for Wikipedia’s database, and also edit it, which made it a site one relied on with a certain amount of caution. Just last week, however, just how unreliable Wikipedia is has become all too obvious. (see article below)

According to the IT magazine, “Wired”, here are a few recent alterations:

“At the United Nations, somebody declares author Oriani Fallici a 'racist whore' and I think it was the UN, or was it the BBC, where somebody said George Bush's middle name is 'wanker' and not 'Walker'. George Bush is also a 'mass murderer' according to another edit.

At Al Jazeera, a staffer declares the founding of Israel as bad as the holocaust, while the Guardian newspaper has rewritten the entry on the rival Times.

To be fair, this is a game the right also play. Republicans rewrote sections on the Iraqi War, the Israeli government altered the entry on Hezbollah, and the FBI altered the entry on Guantanomo Bay and removed photos.

Technology firms and other corporates also remove facts they wish to hide. Thus, Microsoft has removed references to X-Box failures; Dell Computers has apparantly whitewashed its own entry and Novell has removed information about the origins of the Suse Linux software programming language.”

I use a service called Answers.com for a quick lookup of information and the meanings and spellings of words. I complained to them about a year ago that their use of Wikipedia was unwise. Their answer was that they use multiple sources. I think that they and everyone else should stop using Wikipedia entirely until Wikipedia sets up only reputable editors to comb their database for erroneous and biased material and to provide future entries.

New tool exposes self-edits in Wikipedia
IDG News Service 8/16/07, John Blau

A word of caution about editing entries "anonymously" in Wikipedia: a tool has been developed that can show who made the changes.

Virgil Griffith, who will be a graduate student at the California Institute of Technology starting in September, has developed Wikipedia Scanner, a search tool that traces the IP (Internet Protocol) address of people who make edits to the online encyclopedia.

While Wikipedia allows anyone to make edits, it keeps detailed logs of the changes made. And although people can make changes without identifying themselves, the changes often create digital fingerprints that provide information about the user, such as the location of the computer used to make the edit.

Many of the edits detected by the scanner correct spelling mistakes or obvious factual errors, but others have been used to polish entries by rewriting or removing critical material. The scanner has traced entries to people at several large companies who appear to have altered potentially damaging content.

Someone on Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s network, for instance, altered a line about the wages it pays employees. The original entry stated that "Wages at Wal-Mart are about 20% less than at other retail stores," citing the author Greg Palast as the source. The revised entry reads: "The average wage at Wal-Mart is almost double the federal minimum wage," and changes the attribution to Wal-Mart.

A person with access to an IP address at the election systems division of Diebold Inc. cut large sections out of an entry about concerns of security experts over the integrity of Diebold's voting machines, as well as information about the its CEO's fund raising for President George W. Bush. The deleted text was later restored.
And a user of a computer at the British Broadcasting Corp. changed Bush's middle name from "Walker" to "Wanker."

The scanner has also tracked digital fingerprints that have led to computers at the Central Intelligence Agency and the Vatican.

Griffith created the tool to "create minor public relations disasters for companies and organizations I dislike," he wrote on his Web site. He admitted that it's impossible to be sure if the edits were made by someone working at one of the organizations, although the IP address reveals that they were made by someone with access to their network, he says.

"If the edit occurred during working hours, then we can reasonably assume that the person is either an agent of that company or a guest that was allowed access to their network," he wrote.

Griffith came up with the idea when he "heard about Congressmen being caught for white-washing their wikipedia pages," he said.

He said he believes that anonymous speech is important for open projects like Wikipedia. The online encyclopedia works fine today for "noncontroversial topics," he said, but tools like Wikipedia Scanner can help make the site more reliable for controversial topics, he said.

A spokesman for Wikipedia in Germany referred to the scanner tool as a "good development" and encouraged other researchers and people to download data from the online encyclopedia and snoop around. "There's surely plenty to discover," he said via e-mail.